From d1a068e5b1949f6c1c47aecf851daeff6ce560fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Benjamin Otte Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 19:02:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] sorter: Remove a return_if_fail() It's too expsensive. --- gtk/gtksorter.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gtk/gtksorter.c b/gtk/gtksorter.c index 22ef6c4644..9169d22979 100644 --- a/gtk/gtksorter.c +++ b/gtk/gtksorter.c @@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ gtk_sorter_compare (GtkSorter *self, { GtkOrdering result; - g_return_val_if_fail (GTK_IS_SORTER (self), GTK_ORDERING_EQUAL); + /* We turn this off because gtk_sorter_compare() is called so much that it's too expensive */ + /* g_return_val_if_fail (GTK_IS_SORTER (self), GTK_ORDERING_EQUAL); */ g_return_val_if_fail (item1 && item2, GTK_ORDERING_EQUAL); if (item1 == item2) -- 2.30.2